Hard Line Obama

The Obama of 2008 is long gone. Pres. Obama is taking a page from FDR’s 1936 business bashing, class warfare reelection campaign, and getting rough. Obama has abandoned every appeal to independents and moderates in favor of shoring up his left-wing base. Clearly Obama is a professional politician, but the numbers just don’t seem to add up to a 2012 victory.

Obama has provided worthwhile paybacks to his base. The environmental left can look to his shutting down older coal mines along with EPA plans to effectively outlaw all new coal plants. The Keystone XL pipeline will not break ground this year, regardless of Congress’s recent efforts to break the Obama logjam. The DOE has wasted billions of dollars in loan guarantees and grants on ‘green’ energy projects, most of which happened to go to Obama donors.

Big labor may not approve of the environmental left’s opposition to Keystone, but Obama has delivered to this base too. The NLRB has accomplished much of Card Check’s objectives by arbitrarily changing unionizing rules to favor big labor. His recent, perhaps illegal, appointment of three labor lawyers to the NLRB cements the board’s power to force unionization. The NLRB v. Boeing SC factory lawsuit turned out to be nothing more than a strong-arm tactic to force Boeing into a favorable union contract unrelated to the 787.

The trial lawyers can also thank Obama. The Dodd-Frank law is fertile ground for suing when anybody is either denied a credit card or is granted one and then cannot pay. Obamacare does absolutely nothing to stop the gravy train of suing whenever a doctor delivers less than a miracle. The trial lawyers would be fools not to support Obama.

African Americans can look to AG Holder’s hyper-divisive racial rhetoric. Blacks are the Dems’ most reliable base, yet Obama is placating them with words and gestures. Calling the GOP racist over voter ID laws costs nothing, and benefits nobody, yet it is red meat to the base. In exchange for over 95% voter compliance blacks should ask for something more concrete, but Obama knows their vote is secure anyway.

Of course Obama’s class warfare is on display to rally the social justice crowd. These unconscious Marxists love it when Obama pretends that taxing ‘the rich’ is the solution to $1.5 trillion deficits. Hollywood and media types are the Dem PR base, and Obama’s demagoguery is sweet nectar for the jealous / guilt ridden crowd.

The one group Obama no longer speaks to is independents. Most independents want economic opportunity and an answer to how the US government will pay its bills. Moderate voters want small steps, not radicalism. As Reason’s Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch argue, voters have distanced themselves from party affiliation. GOP registration has always lagged the Dems, but the gap has narrowed due to more independents dumping the Dem label than the GOP. In 2008, Obama won the independent vote by 8 points, but that margin may reverse in 2012.

Obama has all but abandoned the independent vote. His anti-business, anti-rich rhetoric may be shoring up his base, but at the expense of alienating independents. A Presidential candidate cannot win solely with his base; independents are too many to ignore. Perhaps Obama will eventually tack center, but most likely Obama is a hardened ideologue who will pursue European socialism because he truly believes it is what Americans want. Unless Obama softens, the key to his reelection is best gauged not by overall approval, but by where he stands with independents, and that is looking doubtful.

A Slower March To Hell

Tomorrow, the Iowa GOP caucuses will yield their punditry fodder. Despite Iowa’s hostility toward Gov. Romney’s East Coast big government, pro-abortion, and socialized medicine record, he may win narrowly. Combined with a decisive victory in New Hampshire, many analysts think an Iowa victory could lock in Romney for the nomination. Tactically, an early Romney lock makes sense – less wasted resources in primary battles, a seasoned politician who does not make mistakes, the fact that good looks matter against all reason. Still, why does the GOP eternally embrace the Democrat agenda in a dilute form? Why does the GOP simply want to slow the march to national destruction?

All the GOP candidates have rightly criticized Pres. Obama for his wild socialism. Through aggressive regulation, shameless union biases, and of course Obamacare, he has thrown a series of socialist hand grenades into the private sector. Jobs are created when investors see a reasonable certainty of profit, and the reams of legislation and regulation foisted by Obama have yet to allow clarity as to where the next jobs will be found.

By contrast, Pres. Bush was a big government failure that took a steady course. Bush socialized prescription medicine, but its impact was reasonably predictable. Bush over regulated corporate finance through Sarbanes Oxley, but it did not reach down to the products and prices people pay for everyday financial transactions. Obama’s big government socialism is like a street drug, while Bush was like a pharmacy pill; both are addictive and dangerous, but one is easier to predict and contain.

Can anyone reasonably claim that a Pres. Romney would be less of a socialist than Bush? Bush had better governor credentials from Texas than Romney has from Massachusetts. Gov. Bush never socialized all of medical care. Gov. Bush never conscripted every citizen into buying health insurance against his will. Even Romney’s excellent hair and winning smile cannot cover his big government instincts.  And how often do politicians exceed their expectations?

Romney offers competence and stability; he has the ability to stay on message (i.e. tell the people the lies they want to hear until they believe them). Romney may be able to beat Obama in November, but is a victory for the GOP a victory for the people? Is getting rid of the worst, most socialistic President since FDR enough? Not nearly so.

Wild man Rep. Paul has been sounding the alarm for decades – the US is in desperate trouble. The US does not have nearly the resources to pay for its immense promises such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a $700 bln military. These are unpopular facts, but the longer they are ignored, the worse the consequences when Athens comes to Washington. Everyone agrees that Paul cannot become President; unfortunately, he is tied to fairly racist newsletters and laughable extremists like the Truthers (although nobody criticizes Obama that many of his Hollywood backers are similarly deranged). Paul is unlikeable and has no political fineness. Still, Shout Bits calls on Iowa to vote for Paul or stay home.

Paul is a messenger, not a candidate. His Iowa support reflects an instinctive sense that the US cannot carry on with the status quo. Romney and Gingrich are the status quo pleading to give big government another chance – this time big government will be better and really solve the nation’s problems. If the GOP continues to embrace this lie, the GOP must be destroyed, and a sharp rebuke of big government is the start. So, Iowa, vote for Paul, and let the other states sort out who really should be President. At this early stage, it is more important to send a message to the GOP establishment than to worry which watered down version of Obama will carry on a slow march to Hell.

Anyone Can Become Kim Jong Il

The world has been spared another day’s company with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il. Even among his evil peers, Mr. Kim’s atrocities stand out. His despotism starved millions of Koreans to death while he developed a reputation as an epicurean. He literally stole Korean and Japanese babies from their parents to train them as spy moles for the communist regime. He sold nuclear weapons technology to state terrorists that are sworn enemies of the US and Israel. He committed various capricious acts of war, including shelling defenseless civilian island homes. As with other evil men, like Mao, Pol Pot, and Ho Chi Minh, people who live free from tyranny are tempted to assume the evil men do is because of bad luck in allowing an evil leader to take control. The ugly reality is that anybody can become a Kim, given the opportunity, and assuming the US is immune is dangerous.

The story of North Korea is another confirmation of Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom, in which he argued that whenever a people cease defending their basic natural rights, a dictator will step in and impose tyranny. Capitalism is an expression of individual rights, and prosperity is the byproduct of capitalism. The purpose of individual rights is to allow people to live as they wish, and prosperity is only a happy byproduct, however this night photo of North Korea is telling:

Where collectivism is permitted, all economic progress is halted. North Korea suffers under a standard of living the rest of the world exceeded several generations ago. Consider North Korea, East Germany, Cuba, and Eastern Europe. Wherever collectivism exists, people suffer. The only path to prosperity is when individuals jealously defend their natural rights.

The US is anything but immune from collectivism and tyranny. The US has forcefully dislocated Georgian property owners based their race (the Trail of Tears). The US has interred Citizens in both WWI and WWII because they shared an ancestry with the enemy. Even the greatest, most free, strongest force for world good has made terrible mistakes. The US has plenty of would-be despots like Mr. Kim waiting for their chance.

When the government dictates to Americans the quantity and variety of health services they must consume, or it abolishes habeas corpus on US soil, the US opens the door a little more to North Korea. Every time individuals cede even a small personal liberty or responsibility to the collective, the chance of an evil tyranny increases. The only defense is to keep government so small that, even when mismanaged, it is powerless to truly ruin anybody’s life.