Greece, Socialism, and Children

The Greek election earlier this month threw out a governing coalition that had negotiated a EU bailout of that nation’s failed economy. The new parliament failed last week to form a government that satisfied the leftist elements’ need to fully reject any austerity measures, so a new, likely more leftist parliament will be elected shortly. Considering that Greece is broke with no hope of paying its debts, rejecting the terms of a €150 bln bailout seems irrational. Thumbing their collective nose at their final lifeline makes no sense except if Greek voters think like children.

Young children are helpless; everything they own and everything they know are dependent on the adults who care for them. That does not stop children from demanding what they want beyond basic care. While the adults are seemingly in the stronger position, children often win the battle over their wants. When a child makes the transition from ward to self-sufficient adult, the adjustment can be jarring – nobody gives adults things simply because they want them.

Socialists play on their subjects’ inner child by promising to take care of the population and ‘give’ them the things they want – much as a parent cares for a child. Too often, as in the case of Greece, the socialist promises are impossible to fulfill. Greece’s credit card is maxed, it cannot afford the pension and work rule promises it made to its people. Gracefully, the rest of the EU agreed to help Greece transition to a realistic level of social policy with loan haircuts and bailout payments. However, like children, the Greek voters are demanding the loan forgiveness and the bailout payments without the cuts to their welfare state. Beggars cannot be choosers, except in the mind of a child.

There are other examples of socialism reducing adults to children. One theory as to why the North Koreans extravagantly bemoaned the overdue death of their Dictator is that they truly believe that everything they have comes from a benevolent father figure. North Korea’s socialist state prevents its people from seeing the obvious truth of their tyranny. The US is not immune; when Social Security and Medicare inevitably fail, the streets will burn even though any rational adult knows that these programs were false promises from the start.

Adulthood means self-sufficiency and the power to act only voluntarily as one deems best. Socialism, as in Greece, means dependency and a return to a child’s mindset. Capitalism requres adulthood because it is the voluntary meeting of people to create and prosper; it requires rational free will. There is no surprise that when the socialist promises in Greece, Italy, Spain, and elsewhere fail, the response is a childish tantrum of want instead of an adult understanding of realistic possibilities.

When Pres. Obama pushes his tax-the-rich policies and general class warfare, he is tapping into the socialist-child connection. Envy and unrestrained want are socialist tools that reduce adults to children. Only a child would believe that a 2000 page document can ‘give’ people healthcare or that life should be ‘fair’ by punishing the rich. Today’s Greece is tomorrow’s US if such arguments and policies remain unchallenged.

Rich People Kick Ass

The greatest rock star is Frank Black (a.k.a. Black Francis) of Pixies and solo career fame (if you disagree, start your own blog). The next fan to stop him on the street should not ask about how he kicked ass making Tromp le Monde despite the Pixies imminent implosion; he should ask “you are rich, right?” The world is polluted with talentless hacks (i.e. Kardashians) who bank obscene sums, so justice demands that true trailblazers who actually contribute something should also be rich. It feels good to know a personal hero is living comfortably because identifying with success instills hope for oneself.

An entire journalism industry dedicates itself to following the lavish excesses of celebrities – their mansions, their six figure bar tabs, their DUI arrests. The wealth of such reporting sources suggests that many Americans are pleased that Johnny Depp is paid $20 million to wear bad makeup and slur his voice for a few weeks. People are very comfortable that George Clooney owns an Italian lake mansion and some sort of a pig for companionship. Why is it, then, that Gov. Romney is reviled for living a similarly privileged lifestyle?

Romney is a “Vulture,” a “Vampire,” a parasite to society. What did he ever do to deserve his wealth? Nobody should be paid that much. These are the sentiments held by the same people who think Britney Spears earned her money. In the 1920′s, captains of industry were worshiped by the pubic just as movie stars are today. The dichotomy shows a failure of free market fans to educate the public on the process and the value of business.

The average OWS protestor thinks businessmen belong to an evil clan that does nothing to help society. Their membership is determined by heredity and race; they do no real work; they are inherently dishonest. Based on the stream of evil businessmen characters in entertainment, it is easy to understand why many feel this way.

Of course the opposite is true. Businessmen reach the top of their profession through skill and exceptional hard work. Over time, business rewards honesty. Most anyone who has a job can thank a businessman who created that opportunity. The occasional business crook is news, not the millions of businessmen who work hard every day to honestly earn a profit and coincidentally power the USA’s economic engine.

Romney is actually a sympathetic figure. People who save some money want to invest it according to their goals and the constraints of how much risk they can bear. Within their constraints, investors want the best return possible, and they pay people like Romney to find the best investments. By applying capital only to the most efficient and profitable investments, Romney fulfilled the wishes of his investors. Along the way, he ensured that capital was not invested where it did not make sense. While layoffs can be tragic, the benefits of Romney’s profession are a huge net positive, albeit hidden. And, yes, Romney was paid very well for being good at his profession.

The difference between the public’s perception of a movie star and Romney is explained by education. The entertainment media constantly talks up the merits of entertainers’ talents, hard work, and contributions. Even the Old Time Media regularly detour into sycophantic puff pieces on favored celebrities. Likewise, the OTM regularly bash businessmen, focusing on the dark side of capitalism and ignoring its vast benefits as a pillar of liberty.

A few shows portray business somewhat positively (e.g. Shark Tank, How It’s Made, Factory Made), but these shows are the exception. Of course business can be boring, and lights and makeup are exotic, but if Hollywood can make the most boring professions (i.e. lawyers and cops) dynamic, they can do the same to inventors and factory bosses. People who become rich are generally dynamic, interesting, and as worthy of the public’s adoration as any celebrity. Turning the tide against the public’s woeful ignorance of the value and honor of businessmen, including Romney, requires a new education about business itself. With 500 cable channels from which to choose, there is clearly room for the entertainment industry to profit while doing so.

How To Make Friends By Arguing Religion

Many TV viewers are familiar with Dan Savage’s media project It Gets Better, which is designed to chipper-up downtrodden gay youths. Not terribly surprisingly, Savage is also a partisan Democrat who has courted the support of many top Democrats such as Pres. Obama and Sec. Clinton. In a recent speech to some high school students, Savage outlined perceived injustices against gays at the hands of Christians and the Holy Bible. Sadly, Savage displayed only enough biblical knowledge to be offensive.

Savage’s general theme is that modern society chooses to ignore some things in the Bible, so why not also ignore the proscription against gay sex (although Savage incorrectly states that the Bible forbids being gay, a subtle difference). The Bible forbids shellfish, commands that previously known brides be stoned to death, and these laws are no longer observed, so why not also ignore Leviticus’s gay sex ban? The reason Christians do not generally follow Halakah is they believe that Jesus set them free from the Old Covenant. The Apostle Peter had a vision wherein God freed him to eat unclean foods. Jesus’s parable of the Good Samaritan overrode the rigid cleanliness laws Savage pretends that Christians simply “ignore.” Jesus specifically stopped the practice of executing adulterous women (“Let he who is without sin . . .”). All of Savage’s criticisms of Christians ignoring Old Testament laws are bunk, but to Savage, whipping Christians is more valuable than researching the truth.

By far Savage’s most virulent Christian attack that day was his repeated insistence that Christianity and the Bible are pro-slavery. He argues that the Bible “got it wrong” on slavery, so why cannot Christians believe the Bible “got it wrong” on gay sex? Specifically, Savage cites Paul’s letter to Philemon wherein Savage alleges Paul argues for the good treatment of a slave, but not his release. Savage omits that Paul was then in prison for being different (a Christian), something Savage need not face in today’s dark anti-gay world. In fact, Paul does ask for the slave to be freed, and he was eventually freed because he went on to travel the world as an Apostle. The myth that the New Testament is pro-slavery also is based on various other verses that mention slavery, but do not specifically condemn the institution. However, the theme of these verses is not acceptance of slavery, but stating that Christianity is open to all classes, even slaves.

Further demolishing Savage’s claim that Christianity and the Bible are pro-slavery is the simple history of abolition. The entire human history involves slavery, which was practiced by all major societies, within and between all races and religions. The practice was only abolished throughout the civilized world thanks to Christians. In England, a Christian government bought and freed the slaves. In England’s colonies and former colonies, Baptists and Presbyterians led the fight to end slavery. Christianity was a religion anchored on the lower classes and slaves. Christianity created the concept that even slaves were equal to the rulers in God’s judgment. The Christian abolition movement of the 19th Century was the fulfillment of Christian principles, not a choice to ignore the Bible. Savage’s slandering of one of Christianity’s greatest gifts to mankind is laughable.

Still, Savage’s pathetic pandering to the atheist Left is no justification for bullying gay teens. Of course only about 4% of the population is gay, so the majority of bully victims are straight. Savage is appropriating a dark facet of human nature – bullying – into the Left’s meme that Christians and Republicans are hateful and are to blame for the world’s injustices. If gays are just normal people, then some of them are hateful bullies too. Perhaps the bullying Savage allegedly suffered was not because he was gay but because of his demonstrated need to pick unfair fights with people who really have no interest in harming him.